In brief
Bread and universal flour may have different protein content. Stronger flour is useful for certain tasks, not a universal answer for any baked goods.
Useful to know
Bread flour often differs from the universal by a higher content of proteins involved in the formation of a gluten structure. King Arthur Baking considers this difference through its products and test bakes. This is a useful principle, but the specific percentages of a brand should not be presented as universal for all markets. When selecting, the exact product and recipe are checked because common commercial categories can be used with different specifications. [1]
Gluten structure is important for the behavior of wheat dough and the retention of gases. The source links the stronger flour to certain bread tasks. [1] It does not follow that the highest available protein percentage is always the most appropriate. Soft pastry and elastic bread dough have different purposes. The useful question is what structure the particular recipe requires. Thus, the number on the packaging becomes part of a solution, not a race for maximum value.
Let's look at a fictional experience with small buns by a tried-and-true formula. We use precisely described flour and record the quantities. If we decide to compare another product, we keep the remaining terms as uniform as possible. Then we observe machinability, shape, and final texture. This gives a more meaningful comparison than a simultaneous change of flour, liquid and way of mixing. Otherwise, the different result has too many possible causes and can hardly be used for the next attempt.
The source also emphasizes that behavior is not limited to one number, especially in different types of flours. [1] Therefore, protein content should be read in context of composition and processing. Wholemeal and refined flour are not the same just because some value is close. For homework, it is more useful to keep the right product in the notes, instead of all the raw materials being reduced to the common word strongly.
When evaluating the finished bread, it is good to set a criterion in advance. Are we looking for a particular shape, a more chewy texture or convenience in shaping? These goals can point to different solutions. It is not necessary for a baking to be declared unsuccessful just because it does not look like another recipe. A clear expectation allows the result to be considered according to its own task and makes the changes more consistent when the formula is repeated.
Bread flour is a useful category when understood as a raw material with certain characteristics. Protein content is an important part, but it does not replace the entire label and tried-and-true recipe. When we connect a product, a formula, and a desired structure, the choice becomes more accurate. Thus, flour ceases to be an indeterminate basis, which must always be held equally, and becomes a concrete part of the technological logic of the baked goods we actually want to obtain. In the bread example, we compare a pre-selected structure, instead of just looking for the highest number on the package.
Sources
For further detail and to check the information: