In brief
Millet is a common name for a group of small-seeded cereals. The amount of liquid and the selected form of the product are important for the desired texture.
Useful to know
The word millet does not denote a single botanical culture in any international context. Whole Grains Council uses the name millet for a group of small seed cereals. They have a long history of cultivation and use in different regions. For the culinary reader, this is a useful starting point: the common name does not negate the need to see what exactly the product is in the package. Whole grain, processed raw material and flour set different tasks in the kitchen. [1]
The source describes use with varying amounts of liquid to produce a more friable or creamier texture. [1] This is not a contradiction, but a choice of a desired result. One garnish and one porridge should not be judged according to the same criterion. Before cooking, it is useful to decide what role the product will have in the dish. Then we follow a tried-and-true recipe or the directions of the particular packaging, instead of expecting a universal proportion to serve all possible forms.
Let's look at a fictional menu with a baked vegetable and a cereal base. If we want separable grains, we describe this goal in advance. If we are looking for a soft bowl base, the task is another. This choice helps to select the rest of the ingredients according to the texture. It is not necessary for millet to imitate rice in every situation. It is more interesting to use it consciously, establishing what shape and consistency suits the particular dish.
For the first try, it is convenient to prepare a small portion and record the amount, liquid and final result. If we change only one factor next time, the comparison will be more useful. The simultaneous addition of more liquid, different fat and a new way of cooking creates many possible explanations. Thus, personal kitchen experience can be arranged and repeated without presenting itself as a general scientific rule for all types of millet.
The botanical and culinary names have different roles. The historical breadth of the group does not mean that every packaging sold is the same. [1] Upon purchase, the name, processing, and directions are read. The product does not have to be loaded with promises of miraculous nutrition to deserve interest. It is enough to be recognized as a specific raw material with a certain behavior and a place on the menu. This is more useful than choosing only a modern name.
Millet can expand the culinary repertoire when approached with a clear purpose. First we establish the shape of the product, then the desired texture and finally the appropriate recipe. Thus, the unknown grain does not become an indefinite substitute for everything else. It gets its own task in the dish. Understanding the common name and the different uses helps the choice to be concrete, and the next attempt to step on an actual observed result instead of on guesswork.
Sources
For further detail and to check the information: